Didactic Rating

Presentation/Didactic Rating Form

Presenter: ______________________________

Topic:__________________________________

Date: ___________________________________

To what extent was the material presented accurate:

  • Inaccurate, unsatisfactory
  • Inaccurate, needs improvement
  • Accurate, satisfactory
  • Comprehensive, excellent

To what extent was the material presented appropriate for the practicing neuropsychologist?

  • Inappropriate for this audience, unsatisfactory
  • Inappropriate for this audience, needs improvement
  • Appropriate, satisfactory
  • Appropriate and helpful, excellent

How was the presentation style?

  • Unsatisfactory o Needs Improvement
  • Adequate/Satisfactory
  • Excellent

What specific comments or feedback do you have for the presenter?

Senior Staff Ratings of Fellow Presentations Only:

Provide an overall rating of the presentation:

1 = This presentation was unacceptable- examples would include major factual errors, significant omissions of relevant data, or issues with presentation style of a severity that precluded following the information.

2 = his presentation was acceptable, but needs improvement- There were factual errors or omissions that distracted from other points, but did not invalidate core ideas, there were some presentation style issues that distracted from the content

3 = This is an acceptable presentation I would expect from a peer, independent practitioner of neuropsychology- Content was appropriate to the practicing neuropsychologist, coherently presented, with adequate presentation style.

4 = This is an outstanding presentation- this would be an excellent presentation regardless of training level or venue; comprehensive, interesting, useful information that is presented in an engaging manner