Didactic Rating
Presentation/Didactic Rating Form
Presenter: ______________________________
Topic:__________________________________
Date: ___________________________________
To what extent was the material presented accurate:
- Inaccurate, unsatisfactory
- Inaccurate, needs improvement
- Accurate, satisfactory
- Comprehensive, excellent
To what extent was the material presented appropriate for the practicing neuropsychologist?
- Inappropriate for this audience, unsatisfactory
- Inappropriate for this audience, needs improvement
- Appropriate, satisfactory
- Appropriate and helpful, excellent
How was the presentation style?
- Unsatisfactory o Needs Improvement
- Adequate/Satisfactory
- Excellent
What specific comments or feedback do you have for the presenter?
Senior Staff Ratings of Fellow Presentations Only:
Provide an overall rating of the presentation:
1 = This presentation was unacceptable- examples would include major factual errors, significant omissions of relevant data, or issues with presentation style of a severity that precluded following the information.
2 = his presentation was acceptable, but needs improvement- There were factual errors or omissions that distracted from other points, but did not invalidate core ideas, there were some presentation style issues that distracted from the content
3 = This is an acceptable presentation I would expect from a peer, independent practitioner of neuropsychology- Content was appropriate to the practicing neuropsychologist, coherently presented, with adequate presentation style.
4 = This is an outstanding presentation- this would be an excellent presentation regardless of training level or venue; comprehensive, interesting, useful information that is presented in an engaging manner